Submitted on behalf of Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, California
Contact
Bonnie Blair
bblair@thompsoncoburn.com
202-585-6905
No summary.
No comment.
See below.
See edits included in the attached mark-up. In the last line, the revised term “sufficiency” included in the mark-up is consistent with other tariff provisions (e.g., Section 29.34(m)).
See edits included in the attached mark-up. In the last line of sub-part (a), the revised term “sufficiency” included in the mark-up is consistent with other tariff provisions (e.g., Section 29.34(m)).
See also suggested edits to Section 11.25.2.2.2 in the attached mark-up.
Although the captions for sub-sections 11.25.3.1 and 11.25.3.2 are different, the language of the two sub-sections is exactly the same. Why?
See No. 11 above.
See the edit to sub-section 44.2.1.2 in the attached mark-up.
See edit included in the attached mark-up.
See edits included in the attached mark-up for Sub-part C of Appendix C.
No comment on Sub-part D of Appendix C.
No additional comments.
See edits included in the attached mark-up. Language to be stricken is identified by strike-through font. Additions are identified by underlined font. All suggested revisions to the CAISO’s draft tariff language are highlighted in yellow.
Choose the question below to view related answers: